«Geghard» gitaverlucakan himnadramy aktiv gorcuneutyun e cavalum
«Geghard» gitaverlucakan himnadrami tnoren Robert Ghazaryan 2023 t․ noyemberi skzbic Hayastani Hanrapetutyan gitutyunneri azgayin akademiayum himnadrvel e nor karuyc: «Geghard» gitaverlucakan himnadramy։ Himnadrami gorcuneutyan himnakan npataknern en: • hayagitutyan ev hasarakakan gitutyunneri volortum hasarakutyan ev petutyan hamar ankax u vstaheli phordzagitakan hetazotutyunneri irakanacum ev dranc ardyunqneri hanrahrchakum, • mijgitakargayin parberakan gitazhoghovneri, dasyntacneri, ashxatazhoghovneri kazmakerpum, • gitahanramatcheli herustaradiohaghordumneri kazmakerpum, ZLM-nerum hayagitutyuny ev hasarakagitutyuny lusabanogh hodvacneri hraparakum, • gitahanramatcheli dasaxosutyunneri kazmakerpum buheri usanoghneri ev avag dprocneri ashakertneri hamar, • phasteri, patmakan iradardzutyunneri xeghatyurmamb nerkayacvogh teghekatvakan hosqeri bacahaytum ev hakazdum, • mijazgayin, taracashrjanayin ev hayastanyan, inchpes naev haykakan sphyurqi gitakan, verlucakan ev lragroghakan kentronneri ev arandzin andzanc het hamagorcakcutyun: Himnadramy tpagrum e naev grqer, anckacnum gitazhoghovner, vortegh nuynpes hay ev arterkri gitnakannery andradarnum en veronshyal harcerin։ «Geghard» gitaverlucakan himnadramy bazmativ hraparakumnerum andradardzel e naev Adrbejani koghmic irakanacvogh patmagitakan keghcararutyunnerin։ Orinak, 2024 t․ adrbejanakan lratvamijocnerov hraparakvec «divanaget, patmaban, patmakan gitutyunneri doktor» Hasan Hasanovi harcazruycy, vory patmutyan tarber drvagneri aghavaghman xtacum e։ Hasanovy pndum e, vor «adrbejanci zhoghovurdy Stalinic 2300 tari araj hunahromeakan aghbyurnerum kochvel e atrpatakanci-adrbejanci» (tes aystegh) ։ Harcazruycum arka pndumnery voch miayn hakagitakan en u li keghciqnerov, aylev hakasum en tramabanutyan orenqnerin։ Angam hark chka hakaphastarkelu, vor m․t․a․ 4-rd darum Atropatesi steghcac petakan miavory voch mi arnchutyun chi karogh unenal zhamanakakic Adrbejan petutyan het։ Da bavarar che: Hasanovn Atropatenei steghcumy ereq dar het e tanum: yndhup minchev Asorestani terutyan korcanum: m․t․a․ 612 tvakan։ Ynd vorum, ir pndmany «kshir talu» hamar heghinaky mejberum e aravel ush shrjani hromeakan u asorakan aghbyurner, voroncum voch mi aknark angam chka Atropatenen m․t․a․ 7-rd darov tvagrelu, aravel evs nerkayis Adrbejani het kapelu veraberyal։ Ays xndri veraberyal karogh eq canotanal «Geghard» himnadrami hetevyal nyuterin Patmagitakan zeghcararutyunnery Adrbejani patmutyan veraberyal Mijnadaryan voch mi qartezum Adrbejan anun goyutyun chuni․ Ruben Galchyan Isk harcin, te inchu carakan shrjanum kam xorhrdayin arajin shrjanum nerkayis adrbejancinery nerkayacvel en tatar etnoanunov, Hasanovy «hantcharegh» patasxan uni: «adrbejanci» anvanumn argelqi tak e eghel։ Xorhrdayin tarinerin mijnadaryan adrbejancu kerpari steghcman masin tes Irakanutyunn ayn e, vor nerkayis Adrbejani taracqum aprogh adrbejancinern sksel en adrbejanci kochvel 1920-1930-akan tvakannerin XSHM varac qaghaqakanutyan shrjanakum։ 1937 t. Xorhrdayin Adrbejani sahmanadrutyan mej hishatakvec «adrbejanci zhoghovurd» ezruyty, isk 1939 t. hamamiutenakan mardahamarov Adrbejani titghosakir zhoghovrdi nerkayacucichnery (naev Xorhrdayin Hayastani ev Xorhrdayin Vrastani tyurqaxos mahmedakannery) stacan «adrbejanci» anvanumy: Chnayac Hasanovy nshum e, vor Staliny voch mi kap chuni «adrbejanci» etnonimi steghcman het, phastn ayn e, vor henc Stalini ghekavarman tarinerin nerkayis adrbejancineri hamar amragrvec ayd anvanumy։ Norutyun che, vor alievyan rezhimy hskayakan mijocner e caxsum, vorpeszi «steghci» Adrbejani patmutyuny ev goghana harevan erkrneri ev zhoghovurdneri patmutyuny ev mshakuyty։ Adrbejanci masnagetnern ayd gorcy sksel ein derevs xorhrdayin tarinerin, sakayn nranq aravel aktivacan hatkapes hetxorhrdayin tarinerin։ Adrbejani ishxanutyunnery arajnahert tiraxavorel en hay zhoghovrdin ev Hayastany։ Bolor hnaravor mijocnerov phordz e arvum aghavaghel ev yuracnel hayeri ev Hayastani patmutyuny։ Avelin, phordz e arvum hayerin meghadrel ayn ararqnerum, vor irenq en gorcel։ Dra var orinakn e, ayspes kochvac, «Xojalui» depqery։ Adrbejanci zinyalnery kotorecin Arcaxi Ivanyan (Xojalu) bnakavayric heracac xaghagh bnakchutyany, aynuhetev sksecin petakan makardakov ayd ameny bardel haykakan koghmi vra (tes: Sephakan zhoghovrdin vochnchacnogh Adrbejany meghadrum e hayerin) ։ Adrbejani ghekavarutyuny araj e qashel naev ayspes kochvac «Arevmtyan Adrbejani» tezy, vori himnakan gaghapharn ayn e, te ibr Hayastani Hanrapetutyan taracqy adrbejancineri patmakan taracqnern en, ev ibr aydteghi iskakan bniknery eghel en adrbejancinery։ Nax ev araj patmakan phastery cuyc en talis, vor Adrbejan aselov minchev 20-rd dary nkati en unecel miayn Araqs getic harav ynkac patmakan, iranakan Atrpatakany։ Erkrord: kovkasyan tatarnerin adrbejanci sksel en kochel miayn 20-rd dari 30-akan tvakanneric։ Errord: ayn taracashrjany, vortegh aysor goyutyun uni Adrbejani Hanrapetutyuny, patmakan aghbyurnerum kochvel e miayn Aghvanq, Aran, Shirvan ev ayln, bayc voch: Adrbejan։ Veronshyal tezn araj qashelov: Adrbejany mi qani npatakner e hetapndum: phordzel yuracnel Hayastani Hanrapetutyan taracqy, ir sephakan zhoghovrdi ushadrutyuny sheghel Adrbejani nersum arka bazmativ himnaxndirneric։ Erkrord: Turqian, ays harcum ajakcelov Adrbejanin, cankanum e, vor Hayastany ev hay zhoghovurdy moracutyan tan Arevmtyan Hayastany ev Hayoc ceghaspanutyan harcy։ Errord: Adrbejany ev Turqian Hayastani Hanrapetutyunum adrbejancineri bnakecumov cankanum en Hayastanum nerqin, mijetnikakan xndirner arajacnel, hetagayum naev: phordzel mijamtel Hayastani Hanrapetutyan nerqin gorcerin։ Phastoren, Adrbejany phordzum e ays keghc tezi iragorcmamb Hayastani bnakchutyan azgayin kazmy phoxel։ Ayspisov, Adrbejany xosum e Hayastani Hanrapetutyan taracq adrbejancineri veradardzi masin ayn depqum, erb inqn: Adrbejany, minch ors neroghutyun chi xndrel Adrbejanic brnagaghtvac hayeric ev voch mi phoxhatucum chi tvel nranc։ Chen patzhvel naev ayn adrbejancinery, voronq 1988-2023 tt․ yntacqum hayeri nkatmamb hancagorcutyunner en kazmakerpel ev irakanacrel։ Adrbejani taracqum naev sharunakvum e ishxanutyunneri koghmic hovanavorvogh mshakutayin ceghaspanutyuny: haykakan hetqi veracumy Adrbejani Hanrapetutyan verahskoghutyan tak gtnvogh taracqum։ Aysor: 21-rd darum, hay azgy ev Hayastan petutyuny nor martahraverneri arjev en kangnel։ Zhamanakin mer petutyan sahmannery aynpes en gcagrvel otarneri koghmic, vor aysor menq haytnvel enq bavakanin bard ashxarhagrakan mijavayrum։ Unenalov kayun, baridraciakan haraberutyunner mer haravayin ev hyusisayin qaghaqakrtutyunneri het, xosqy iranakan ev vrac-kovkasyan qaghaqakrtakan taracqneri masin e, cavoq srti menq nuyny chenq karogh asel mer arevelyan ev arevmtyan ughghutyunneri masin։ Tyurqakan ashxarhi karevoraguyn baghadrichy kazmogh erku petutyunneri (Turqia, Adrbejan) hamar haykakan qaghaqakrtutyuny ir isk goyutyamb xochyndot e handisanum irenc heragna cragrerum։ Sakayn ayd ameny gitakcelov handerdz menq petq e haskananq, vor nranq mer harevan petutyunnern en ev petq e phordzenq kargavorel haraberutyunnery nranc het։ Inchpisi mexanizmnerov kam inchpisi metodnerov menq dran khasnenq, da harci ayl koghmn e։ Sakayn ays tesankyunic menq partadrvac enq inch-or lucumner gtnel, lucumner, voronq, sakayn, vnas chen hascni mer petutyan geraka shaherin ev klinen miayn hayanpast։ --- Historical Falsifications Carried out by Azerbaijan: A case Study Robert Ghazaryan, Haykuhi Muradyan For decades, Azerbaijan has systematically engaged in the falsification of historical narratives, distorting and appropriating the cultural and historical heritage of neighboring countries, particularly Armenia. This deliberate campaign, which intensified during the post-Soviet era, seeks to erase Armenian presence and influence in the region. By fabricating historical accounts and promoting false narratives, such as the misrepresentation of the Azerbaijani identity and territorial claims over Armenia, Azerbaijan aims to legitimize its aggressive actions and undermine Armenian cultural heritage, especially in contested regions like Artsakh. Since the establishment of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the appropriation of Armenian cultural heritage and history has been an integral component of Azerbaijan's state policy. This includes both physical destruction and manipulative practices such as renaming and distorting historical realities. The overarching objective of this policy is to legitimize territorial claims and establish a narrative suggesting that Azerbaijan or their historical "ancestors" have longstanding roots in the region. Despite obstacles posed by the enduring presence of Armenians in the area and a rich cultural heritage, Azerbaijani policy has consistently aimed at advancing this narrative. This goal persists, with Azerbaijan employing various methods to exploit cultural heritage, both during times of peace and conflict. From September 19th to October 5th, 2023, Azerbaijan completed a plan of ethnic cleansing of Armenians from The Republic of Artsakh, an area where Armenians have lived for centuries. This happened gradually over three years, involving a big war in 2020, continuous breaking of ceasefire agreements, and slow military advances after the fighting officially stopped. From December 2022, there was a ten-month blockade, cutting off important resources like gas, electricity, and aid. In the final stage, there was a one-day war and Azerbaijani forces took control up to the outskirts of Stepanakert, the capital of the Republic of Artsakh. Faced with a serious threat, more than 100, 000 Armenians living in Artsakh, almost the entire population forcibly moved to Armenia in just one week. The aftermath of this military action has stirred heightened apprehension over the potential threat posed to the rich Armenian cultural heritage that remains in the region. Approximately 6, 000 monuments in Artsakh, more than 3 dozen museums and private collections are now within the control of Azerbaijan which is very well known for its unwavering intolerance towards Armenian historical remnants. The "Geghard" Scientific Analytical Foundation (https://geghard-saf.am/ see Appendix) reacts to the historical falsifications carried out by Azerbaijan in numerous publications. For example, in 2024, an interview with Hasan Hasanov was published in Azerbaijani media, in which he presents a distorted account of various episodes of history. Hasanov asserts that "the Azerbaijani people were referred to as Atropatene-Azerbaijani in Greco-Roman sources 2, 300 years before Stalin." (see ''The Azerbaijani scientist pushed back the famous historical event by 300 years'') . In addition to being pseudo-scientific and replete with misrepresentations and fabrications, the statements made in the interview also exhibit a fundamental lack of logical coherence. It is evident that the state established by Atropates in the fourth century BC has no direct correlation with the modern state of Azerbaijan. Moreover, Hasanov posits that Atropatene was established three centuries prior, coinciding with the dissolution of the Assyrian Empire in 612 BCE. To substantiate his assertion, the author cites Roman and Assyrian sources from a subsequent era, which offer no indication that Atropatene originated in the seventh century BCE or bears any resemblance to the contemporary Azerbaijani state. For further information on this topic, please refer to the following materials from the Geghard Foundation.Historiographical falsifications regarding the history of Azerbaijan There is no toponym Azerbaijan in any mediaeval map, Ruben Galichian In response to the question of why the modern Azerbaijanis were referred to as Tatars during the Tsarist and early Soviet periods, Hasanov offers a compelling explanation. He asserts that the name "Azerbaijani" was effectively banned, which would explain why the Tatars were referred to by this term. For further insight into the creation of the image of a medieval Azerbaijani in the Soviet era, one might consult the following articles.The comparison of the creation of "Medieval Azerbaijani" during the Great Patriotic War according to I. Petrushevsky's works The population of Baku in the 19th century The historical record demonstrates that the designation "Azerbaijani" was applied to Azerbaijanis residing in the territory of modern Azerbaijan in accordance with the policies implemented by the USSR in the 1920s and 1930s. In 1937, the term "Azerbaijani people" was included in the Constitution of Soviet Azerbaijan. Furthermore, in 1939, the All-Union Census designated representatives of the titular people of Azerbaijan (as well as the Turkic-speaking Muslims of Soviet Armenia and Soviet Georgia) as "Azerbaijani." Although Hasanov asserts that Stalin was not involved in the establishment of the ethnonym "Azerbaijani, " it was during Stalin's tenure that this designation became prevalent among the contemporary Azerbaijanis.It is widely acknowledged that the Aliyev regime invests significant resources in the fabrication of Azerbaijan's historical narrative and the appropriation of the historical and cultural heritage of neighboring countries and peoples. The Azerbaijani specialists responsible for this undertaking commenced their activities during the Soviet era, but they became more active in the post-Soviet years. The Azerbaijani authorities have primarily targeted the Armenian people and Armenia. All possible means are employed to distort and appropriate the history of the Armenians and Armenia. Furthermore, Armenians are accused of committing acts that they themselves did not perpetrate. A case in point is the so-called "Khojaly" events. The Azerbaijani armed forces massacred peaceful civilians who had evacuated the settlement of Ivanyan (Khojaly) in Artsakh, and then sought to blame the Armenian side at the state level. (see Azerbaijan, which killed its own people, blames Armenians) The Azerbaijani government promotes the concept of "Western Azerbaijan, " claiming that the territory of the Republic of Armenia is historically Azerbaijani and as if was originally inhabited by Azerbaijanis. However, historical evidence contradicts this assertion. Prior to the 20th century, the term "Azerbaijan" exclusively referred to Atropatene, a region south of the Araks River. (See Azerbaijanis attempt to connect their history to the Kingdom of Atropatene, but the reality is different) . Secondly, the Caucasian Tatars began to be called Azerbaijanis only in the 1930s. Thirdly, the region where the Republic of Azerbaijan exists today has historically been called Albania, Arran, Shirvan, etc., but not Azerbaijan. (See Bakikhanov’s "The Heavenly Rose-Garden" and the Azerbaijani falsifications) Via the promotion of this concept, Azerbaijan pursues several goals: attempting to annex the territory of the Republic of Armenia, diverting its own people's attention from numerous internal problems. Secondly, Turkey supports Azerbaijan in this issue, attempting to force Armenia and the Armenian people to forget about Western Armenia and the Armenian Genocide. Thirdly, through the settlement of Azerbaijanis in the Republic of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey aim to provoke internal, interethnic problems in Armenia and subsequently interfere in the internal affairs of the Republic of Armenia. In fact, Azerbaijan is trying to change Armenia's demography by implementing this false concept. (See ''Return'' as a tool of Azerbaijan's hybrid attack on Armenia) Consequently, Azerbaijan advocates the repatriation of Azerbaijanis to the territory of the Republic of Armenia. However, Azerbaijan has yet to issue an apology to Armenians who were forcibly displaced from Azerbaijan or provide compensation to them. Furthermore, the Azerbaijanis who organized and perpetrated crimes against Armenians from 1988 to 2023 have not been held to account. The Azerbaijani authorities continue to sponsor cultural genocide, with the erasure of Armenian heritage in the territories under the control of the Republic of Azerbaijan. In the current era of the 21st century, the Armenian nation and the Republic of Armenia are confronted with novel challenges. The borders of our state were delineated by external actors in a manner that has resulted in a rather intricate geographical configuration. While stable and friendly relations are maintained with our southern and northern neighbors, encompassing the Iranian and Georgian-Caucasian cultural spaces, unfortunately, the same cannot be said for our eastern and western directions. For two states that are important components of the Turkic world (Turkey and Azerbaijan), the existence of Armenian civilization presents a significant obstacle to their long-term plans. Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize that these states are our neighbors and that we must endeavor to normalize relations with them. The question then becomes: How might we achieve this? What mechanisms or methods might we employ to do so? Undoubtedly, finding solutions that align with the paramount interests of our state and are favorable to Armenia is of paramount importance. Appendix In November 2023, the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia established the "Geghard" Scientific Analytical Foundation. The main objectives of the foundation are: • - To conduct independent and reliable expert research in the fields of Armenian studies and social sciences for the society and the state, and popularizing its results, • - To organize interdisciplinary scientific conferences, courses and workshops, • - To organize popular scientific television and radio programs, publishing articles in the media on Armenian studies and social sciences, • - To organize popular science lectures for university and high school students, • - To isentify and counter information flows that distort facts and historical events, - To Cooperate with international, regional, Armenian and Diaspora scientific, analytical and media organizations and individuals, The Foundation also publishes books and conducts scientific conferences, workshops and seminars where Armenian and foreign scientists and researchers address the aforementioned issues. |